WWE Money in the Bank 2016

Urgh. I wanted Owens to win for a start. Was so happy when Rollins regained the title as I didn't see that happening (expected Reigns to be champ for quite a while), then bummed out because he lost it straight away. I just don't rate Ambrose as a main eventer. His punches are weak looking as fuck and his whole gimmick seems to be "I'm aggressive (lol), pull funny faces during matches and speak like I've had a few too many before facing the crowd". He hasn't even shown that he's a good wrestler at all to me, not in WWE anyway. I don't get why people like him.

Ambrose has proven with his title matches against Rollins last year and Triple H at Roadblock that he can deliver on a main event level. He's charismatic as hell, quite funny, and good in the ring. Reminds me of a Austin/Pillman hybrid. I don't get why you dislike him. I mean weak punches is hardly a huge flaw plenty of guys can't punch for shit.

Considering he seems to go for a brawler style, it matters. Half the time he doesn't even make them look like they're connecting which just makes them look worse. His actual moves aren't that good either. I've seen him wrestler before WWE and he was good and made moves look good (had a fair few more as well). In WWE though, he's average and seems to think making faces during matches is a character. It's a shame, as I know he can be better as I've seen it. WWE Dean Ambrose though shouldn't be any higher than upper-midcard to me. I can't buy him as a champion at all.

As for the end of the PPV, if someone had told me that Ambrose was walking out as champion, I'd have booked it like how when Rollins won it. Ambrose comes down near the end of the match and cashes in, but instead of pinning Rollins, takes out Reigns and pins the champ. The triple threat can then come in as Rollins can complain about being cheated as he never lost, and it adds something between Reigns and Ambrose. Ambrose can also then say that he took a page out of Rollins book since he won the title in a similar way to when Rollins did.

I think the way they did it makes the most sense. Now Rollins and Reigns both get rematches due to a "rematch clause"!